Love, Truth, Peace, Freedom, & Justice

  • Home
  • Study Materials for Moors
  • Civics Class Registration
  • Fundraiser for C.J.P.P.
  • Consultation and Training
  • National ID and Recording
  • Decolonize Now Campaign
  • Press Release
  • More
    • Civics Workshop Videos
    • Enforcement Archive
    • Declare Your Nationality
    • Proclamations from States
    • Reverse the Name Change
    • Surrender the License
    • Consular Jurisdiction
    • William Dungey Case
    • Consular Court Cases
    • Mortgage Fraud
    • Foreclosure Cases
    • Gun Range Case
    • Parole Case
    • Fraudulent Lien Case
    • Criminal Cases
    • Habeas Corpus Cases
    • Traffic Cases
    • Bethesda Mansion Case
    • Rise of the Moors Case
    • Research
    • Silver Coins
    • Natural Sea Moss
  • Contact Us
  • More
    • Home
    • Study Materials for Moors
    • Civics Class Registration
    • Fundraiser for C.J.P.P.
    • Consultation and Training
    • National ID and Recording
    • Decolonize Now Campaign
    • Press Release
    • More
      • Civics Workshop Videos
      • Enforcement Archive
      • Declare Your Nationality
      • Proclamations from States
      • Reverse the Name Change
      • Surrender the License
      • Consular Jurisdiction
      • William Dungey Case
      • Consular Court Cases
      • Mortgage Fraud
      • Foreclosure Cases
      • Gun Range Case
      • Parole Case
      • Fraudulent Lien Case
      • Criminal Cases
      • Habeas Corpus Cases
      • Traffic Cases
      • Bethesda Mansion Case
      • Rise of the Moors Case
      • Research
      • Silver Coins
      • Natural Sea Moss
    • Contact Us
  • Home
  • Study Materials for Moors
  • Civics Class Registration
  • Fundraiser for C.J.P.P.
  • Consultation and Training
  • National ID and Recording
  • Decolonize Now Campaign
  • Press Release
  • More
    • Civics Workshop Videos
    • Enforcement Archive
    • Declare Your Nationality
    • Proclamations from States
    • Reverse the Name Change
    • Surrender the License
    • Consular Jurisdiction
    • William Dungey Case
    • Consular Court Cases
    • Mortgage Fraud
    • Foreclosure Cases
    • Gun Range Case
    • Parole Case
    • Fraudulent Lien Case
    • Criminal Cases
    • Habeas Corpus Cases
    • Traffic Cases
    • Bethesda Mansion Case
    • Rise of the Moors Case
    • Research
    • Silver Coins
    • Natural Sea Moss
  • Contact Us

“In order to change a people, you must change their literature.”

 When Noble Drew Ali made the above statement, he was talking about power over consciousness, not just books. 


Literature shapes identity

“Literature” isn’t only novels or textbooks. Noble Drew Ali was pointing to everything a people read, recite, study, and accept as authoritative, including:

  • History books
  • Law books
  • Religious texts
  • Dictionaries and definitions
  • School curricula
  • Newspapers and records
  • Court language and legal classifications


Who a people believe they are comes from what they are told they are—and that story is carried through literature.

Change the story → change the people.

 

Control the narrative, control the mind

If you replace a people’s original records with foreign definitions, you can:

  • Rename them
  • Reclassify them
  • Redefine their status
  • Strip them of history, nationality, and rights
     

Noble Drew Ali understood that colonization happens first on paper, not on battlefields. Once a people accept false records about themselves, they begin to self-police, self-limit, and self-identify according to those records.


That’s why he emphasized reclaiming:

  • Proper names
  • Proper nationality
  • Proper history
  • Proper law

 

Literature creates law and jurisdiction

In law, words create status, and status determines jurisdiction.


If literature defines a people as:

  • Property → they can be administered
  • Subjects → they can be governed
  • Wards → they can be managed
  • “Black,” “Negro,” “Colored” → they can be regulated under special codes
     

Then courts, contracts, and institutions will treat them accordingly.

Noble Drew Ali was warning that false literature produces false authority, and that people trapped in false records will be ruled by them.


 

Why Noble Drew Ali introduced new (old) literature

This is why he brought forward:

  • The Holy Koran of the Moorish Science Temple of America
  • Lessons, cards, and proclamations
  • Historical reminders of Moorish identity
  • Re-education around nationality and law
     

He wasn’t inventing something new—he was restoring suppressed literature so people could remember who they were before foreign narratives replaced their records.

 

The deeper message

He was really saying:

You cannot free a people with chains on their mind.
And the chains are written in books, laws, and records.

Change the literature →
Change the definitions →
Change the status →
Change the destiny.


In short

Noble Drew Ali meant that true liberation begins with correcting the written record—because whoever controls the literature controls:

  • Thought
  • Identity
  • Law
  • Power

Schedule a Consultation

If you need lawful advice or consular assistance, or just need understanding with nationalization, we are here to help. Contact us today to schedule a consultation by clicking the link below.

Schedule Now

Consular Jurisdiction & Protection, who does it applies to?

 Qualifications, Duties, and Treaty Standing

Not all Moors are entitled to consular jurisdiction or the protection of the Moroccan Flag.


Consular jurisdiction is not automatic, nor is it conferred by self-identification alone. It is a treaty-based protection reserved for those who are properly qualified, nationally grounded, and in alignment with their lawful status and duties.

Moorish Americans possess a treaty right to consular jurisdiction in any dispute involving foreign colonial citizens of the United States of America and their corporate subjects. This right flows from recognized nationality, lawful standing, and adherence to the principles that distinguish a free national people from a colonized class.


However, there are circumstances in which individuals who call themselves “Moors” or “Moorish-Americans” are not qualified for consular jurisdiction. Those who abandon the principles of their ancient foremothers and forefathers, and instead cling to doctrines, customs, and behaviors that perpetuate dependency, subjugation, or mental slavery, are classified as undesirable and are not entitled to protection.
(See Chapter 47:15–17 of the Holy Koran of the Moorish Science Temple of America.)


Moorish Americans are part and parcel of the (con)federal government and must therefore live, conduct themselves, and govern accordingly. Nationality carries responsibilities. One must study, demonstrate discipline, and show themselves approved—rightly dividing truth from error—rather than imitating systems that deny one’s own lawful status.


Any person who claims the name “Moorish-American” while acting in hypocrisy—by word, conduct, or allegiance—forfeits the protections associated with nationality and remains subject to the inferior classifications, abuses, and mistreatment imposed by foreign colonial citizens and their subjects.


Consular protection is earned through knowledge, discipline, and lawful alignment—not rhetoric.


Study the Congressional Records and International Conventions below

to understand the legal foundation, scope, and limits of consular jurisdiction.

To begin your Rite of Passage toward nationality, decolonization, and lawful standing with us,
click the link below.

Find out more

"Moorish Americans are Part and Parcel of the Government" - Act 4 of Divine Constitution and By-Laws explained

Trump - "Birthright Citizenship under 14th Amendment was meant for the children of African slaves." Moorish-Americans are not that.

1514 - Decolonization Resolution of 1960

Download PDF

CONGRESSIONAL RECORD - Slave Laws for 'Negros' and 'Indians'

The Negro Law of South Carolina 1848 (Black Codes)

Below is the 'Negro Law of South Carolina' (Black Codes) from the records of the Library of Congress. The terms "Negro" (now term "Black") and "Indian" are brand names for chattel property, also termed 'Beast of Burden' and 'Steaks' on the table by choice and consent.


Go to Sect. 4 (highlighted) you will see the term "negro" does not embrace "free Moors".

Go to Sect. 63 (highlighted) you will see the "Act does not extend to free Moors."

Download PDF

United Nations Convention on Stateless Persons 1954

Download PDF

Letter from the United States Secretary of State 1906

Download PDF

Act of Algeciras of April 7, 1907

The Algeciras Conference was a meeting to ratify European intervention in Morocco following the First Moroccan Crisis. The conference was attended by Germany, Austria-Hungary, the United Kingdom, France, the Russian Empire, Spain, the United States, the Kingdom of Italy, Morocco, the Netherlands, Sweden, Portugal, and Belgium.


 The police would be organized and established under the Sultan's authority, recruited from Moorish Mussulmans (Moslems), and commanded by Moorish Kaids (leaders or commanders).

Download PDF

Right of Protection in Morocco July 3, 1880

Below is the Right of Protection in Morocco - Convention of Madrid, July 3, 1880, which was a series of agreements between the Emperor of Morocco and European governments that established a legal framework for Morocco and gave European countries feudal ownership of Moroccan land and resources in usufruct. 


Purpose

The convention was the result of the Conference of Madrid, which was held in 1880 at the request of Sultan Hassan I. The conference was intended to improve Morocco's reform and provide a legal framework for the Sultan. 


Agreements

The convention gave European countries the right to claim ownership to fee simple land and assets in Morocco, as well as the resources on those lands in usufructuary. It also gave them settlement rights and the right to employ locals on the land. 


Articles

The convention included articles on the protection of native Moors, the selection of interpreters and employees by foreign representatives, and the selection of employees by consular officers.


Impact

The convention regulated and made the European conquests official in the international community. It also allowed the consuls of the United States to exercise jurisdiction over American nationals in Morocco. 

[See 'Act of August 1, 1956' following this PDF]

Download PDF

Act of August 1, 1956, Repeals Title 22 USC 141 - 143

The United States of America established United States Consular Courts in Morocco by authority of Articles 20 and 21 of the Treaty of Peace and Friendship of 1836 between the United States of North America and the Moroccan Empire. 


On August 1, 1956, the United States relinquished their consular jurisdiction in Morocco as shown in the below PDF under Public Law 856, and all United States Consular Courts in Morocco (North America) were abolished. 


As a result, the Secretary of State for the United States Department of State established the 'Consular Notification and Access' manual in order to carry out the treaty obligations of the United States with certain foreign governments, including Morocco (Empire), regarding the arrest or detention of foreign nationals.

Download PDF

Title 22 USC 141 - 143, United States Consular Courts

Download PDF

United States Consular Notification and Access Manual (2018)

Download PDF

Disabilities of Free Persons of Color

Download PDF

Addressing the misunderstanding of Consular Jurisdiciton

The word consul derives from the Latin word consulo which means 'to consult', because these officers consulted with the senate on administrative measures.


Black's Law Dictionary, 5th Edition (page 286): 

  • Consul.  (Int'l.) An officer of a commercial character, appointed by the different states to watch over the mercantile [trade or commercial] interests of the appointing state and of its subjects in foreign countries.


  • Consular court.   Courts held by the consuls of one country, within the territory of another, under authority given by treaty, for the settlement of civil cases. In some instances they had also a criminal jurisdiction, but in this respect were subject to review by the courts of the home government. See 22 U.S.C.A. § 1 4 1 . The last of the United States consular courts (Morocco) was abolished in 1 956.


The prerequisites of 'due process of law' regarding any dispute or criminal complaint between any Moor and foreign occidental European colonist / citizen of the United States, for the enforcement of treaty rights and treaty obligations are enforceable under consular jurisdiction and venue; and both foreign jurisdictions are universally known at sea by which flag they fly in accordance with the 'Law of Flags' (page 574):

  • In maritime law, the law of that nation or country whose flag is flown by a particular vessel. A shipowner who sends his vessel into a foreign port gives notice by his flag to all who enter into contracts with the master that he intends the law of that flag to regulate such contracts, and that they must either submit to its operation or not contract with him.


Black's Law Dictionary, 8th Edition (page 948-949):

  • Consul. n.1. A governmental representative living in a foreign country to oversee commercial and other matters involving the representative's home country and its citizens in that foreign country. • Consuls are not diplomatic agents, so, unless a treaty provides otherwise, they do not enjoy diplomatic privileges and immunities. But consuls are entitled to consular immunities, which protect them from local law and jurisdiction in the exercise of their consular functions.


  • “Consuls are commercial, not diplomatic agents. They reside abroad for the purpose of protecting the individual interests of traders, travellers, and mariners belonging to the State which employs them.... They exercise jurisdiction over their countrymen, their persons are inviolable, their residences may be used as asylums in the case of war or tumult, and in fact they possess more than the ordinary diplomatic immunities.” T.J. Lawrence, A Hand-book of Public International Law 86–87 (10th ed. 1925).


  • “Consuls are not diplomatic agents; they perform various services for a state or its subjects in another state, without, however, representing the former in the full sense. They may be nationals of either state, and generally they are made subject to the authority of the diplomatic representative of the state for which they act. They watch over commercial interests of the state for which they act; collect information for it; help its nationals with advice, administer their property if they die abroad, and register their births, deaths, and marriages; they authenticate documents for legal purposes, take depositions from witnesses, visa passports, and the like.” J.L. Brierly, The Law of Nations 216 (5th ed. 1955).


The North American continent is under binding international treaty law, i.e., the Treaty of Peace and Friendship of 1836 between the United States of North America and the Moroccan Empire, which superseded the organic Treaty of Peace and Friendship of 1787 between the United States of America and His Imperial Majesty the Emperor of Morocco. This Treaty is proof of there being two (2) jurisdictions that are foreign to each other, and are operating at North America for the purpose of amity and commerce: (1) the United States Republic of North America and (2) the Moroccan Empire which is the home government of the land.


Whenever the aboriginal Moors are engaged in any form of commerce (trade, buying, selling, etc.) with the citizens of the United States, i.e., the foreign hybrid European colonists, there must be a consular jurisdiction available within the jurisdiction of either party to the Treaty in an event that there is a dispute or controversy per Articles 20 and 21 of such Treaty, which aver the following:


Article 20. If any of the citizens of the United States, or any Persons under their Protection, shall have any disputes with each other, the Consul shall decide between the Parties; and whenever the Consul shall require any Aid, or Assistance from our Government, to enforce his decisions, it shall be immediately granted to him. 


Article 21. If a Citizen of the United States should kill or wound a Moor, or, on the contrary, if a Moor shall kill or wound a Citizen of the United States, the Law of the Country shall take place, and equal Justice shall be rendered, the Consul assisting at the Trial; and if any Delinquent shall make his escape, the Consul shall not be answerable for him in any manner whatever.

2013 Bethesda Mansion Case

Click above to see '2013 Bethesda Mansion' case. This case was dismissed with prejudice for lack of jurisdiction and fraud.

Foreclosure Cases

Click above to see 'Foreclosure' cases.  These cases were dismissed with prejudice for lack of jurisdiction and fraud. 

Child Custody Cases

Click above to see 'Child Custody' cases.  These cases were dismissed with prejudice for lack of jurisdiction and fraud. 

Fraudulent Lien Case

Click above to see 'Fraudulent Lien' case.  This case was dismissed with prejudice for lack of jurisdiction and fraud. 

Traffic Cases

Click above to see 'Traffic' cases. These cases were dismissed with prejudice for lack of jurisdiction and fraud.  

Habeas Corpus Cases

Click above to see 'Habeas Corpus' cases. The Moorish Americans were released from unlawful imprisonment under consular jurisdiction. 

Official Website of the Consul General of Morocco

press@enforcetheconstitution.org

Hours of Operation: Monday-Friday - 10am-5pm EST

Copyright © 2025 Enforce The Constitution.org - All Rights Reserved.

Powered by

FORECLOSURE CASE DISMISSED
All attempted Writs of Possession DENIED!

Another Moorish-American preserves his estate.


⚖️ Assistance, Instruction & Guidance Provided Through:
Membership with Enforce The Constitution civic organization.


📂 Filed records are published below for public verification and scrutiny.
The record speaks for itself.

Learn More

This website uses cookies.

We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data. Don't worry, you're safe.

Accept