DECOLONIZE NOW! Campaign

The early Continental Congress, which consisted of 35 free Moors of the Haudenosaunee Confederacy of Nations / Tribes and 20 foreign European sons who were representatives from the British colonies in America within the dominions of his Imperial Majesty the Emperor of Morocco, Sidi Mohammed ben Al Abdallah, declared independence for the united Colony-States of America from King George (a Moor) of Great Britain on the basis of Natural Law and Nature’s God as shown in the preamble of the Declaration of Independence (1776). They condemned the King’s obstruction of “naturalization of foreigners” — proving that the original naturalization framework was meant to regulate incoming European immigrants in America, not the aboriginal Moorish inhabitants of America.

Under the Articles of Confederation (1781), before the Naturalization Act of 1790/1795 created a uniform federal system for immigration, each state of the union regulated foreigners under its own poor laws and settlement laws (which were inherited from English law).

Most foreign European newcomers were landless and indentured — legally “paupers” until they acquired property or a sponsor. They were wanderers between ports and settlements — legally “vagabonds” until a township or state accepted them. Many were debtors, deserters, or political refugees — legally treated like “fugitives from justice” unless they had papers of good conduct. 

So although Article IV of the Articles of Confederation of 1781 doesn’t label every foreign European colonist directly as a pauper, vagabond, or fugitive, the presumption of the law was exactly that until the alien had been:

1. lawfully admitted,
2. completed residency,
3. renounced foreign allegiance,
4. and taken the oath of citizenship before a court of record.

Until then, the foreign European colonizer was not a “free inhabitant” but a "resident alien" falling under one or more of those above excluded categories.

Foreign European colonizers = aliens under probation, excluded from privileges until naturalized.

Aboriginal Moors = the posterity of the continental congress, not aliens, not subject to that probation.

The 1790 Act limited citizenship to “free white persons of good character” who had resided for two years and swore allegiance.
The 1795 Act extended that to a five-year probation, requiring formal renunciation of previous allegiances — meaning foreign Europeans were legally aliens under probation until naturalized. During that five-year period, they were neither citizens nor free inhabitants under Article IV, but classified in poor laws as paupers, vagabonds, or fugitives from justice until completion of naturalization.

The Acts of 1790/1795 were therefore not racial in the modern sense but jurisdictional instruments controlling alien Europeans entering a pre-existing aboriginal political order — the Moors of Amexem.

The 1870 Act altered the original 1790/1795 framework, shifting naturalization from jus sanguinis (right of blood) to jus soli (right of soil) — a feudal principle tied to property, not lineage. This allowed the foreign European colonizer to claim “native birthright” while demoting the aboriginal Moors to corporate wards under the Black Codes, thus effecting the “colorable” citizenship fraud

It’s the later 14th Amendment and Naturalization Act of 1870 that flipped this script, misclassifying the true Moorish heirs of the land into “corporate persons” and “immigrants” while allowing the true immigrants claim native status by fraud.

• This proves that the original framework of the Articles of Confederation of 1781 and early Naturalization Acts (1790/1795) treated foreign Europeans as outsiders, under probation.
• It also shows that Moorish and aboriginal peoples were not “immigrants” — they were already the natural posterity whose law was borrowed to create the Constitution.
• The later shift to the 14th Amendment “birthright citizenship” (jus soli) inverted this order: it made foreign European colonists appear as the “natives” while casting the aboriginal people into the artificial brand name categories: Negro, Black, Colored, Indian, etc.

The Act incorporated the DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (Inc.) into a single municipal entity:

“All that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia be… created into a government by the name of the District of Columbia, by which name it is hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes.”

This clause legally transformed the District from a neutral federal territory into a corporate municipal de facto government with powers to contract, sue, be sued, and operate like a private corporation. It vested executive authority in a Governor appointed by the President, legislative authority in a local assembly, and fiscal authority in a Board of Public Works.

The Act effectively merged federal governance and municipal functions, replacing the organic constitutional republican government with a municipal corporate jurisdiction. This is called a coup d'état (a sudden, violent, and unlawful seizure of power from a government; a coup) ["a military coup d'état brought down the government"].

This structure was modeled on private law—meaning it operated by contract, debt, and corporate charter, rather than by constitutional sovereignty. “The District of Columbia … is hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes, and may contract and be contracted with.”
 

This was the first formal corporate charter of what later evolved into the “UNITED STATES CORPORATION COMPANY” (see  Clearfield Trust Doctrine - Clearfield Trust Company vs. United States, 318 U. S. 363 – 371 (1942)). This Act was introduced shortly after:

• The Civil War (1861–1865),
• The 14th Amendment of 1868 which was never lawfully ratified by 3/4 of the states, and
• The 1870 Naturalization Act (which extended citizenship to “persons of African descent”).
   

This sequence created the statutory environment necessary for converting the de jure (lawful) republic into a de facto (commercial) entity. Under the 14th Amendment, all persons “subject to the jurisdiction” of the United States were made “citizens of the United States.” The Organic Act of 1871 gave that jurisdiction a corporate seat—the DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (Inc.).

Hence, all “citizens of the United States” after 1871 became corporate citizens—legal fictions domiciled in the municipal corporation known as the “DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (Inc.),” not members of the original confederated republic.

After 1871:

• The DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA (Inc.) municipal corporation could contract independently, bypassing treaties by operating as a private entity.
• This allowed the creation of corporate citizenship under color of law, replacing nationality with “corporate personhood.”
• The United States Consular Courts in Morocco (Empire) remained in force until the Act of August 1, 1956 - Public Law 856 (1956) formally abolished them, completing the process of jurisdictional consolidation.

  This is the hidden architecture behind the Naturalization Acts (1790/1795, and 1870), the 14th Amendment, and the Organic Act of 1871. The social engineering mechanism that changed nationality and naturalization from a limited, court-based, oath-based process (1790/1795) into a mass status-engineering system used by foreign European colonists to: 

(1) reclassify themselves as “free white persons” and 

(2) denationalize the aboriginal Moors under the “Negro/Black/Colored/Indian” code statuses. 

After the Civil War, the foreign European colonizers (mixed stock immigrants, many of them not Anglo-Saxon) began calling themselves “white” as a political label to secure privileges.
By controlling Congress and the Naturalization Act of 1870, they wrote themselves into the “free white person” category even though they were colonists/immigrants.
This is how they began to 'weaponize' the Naturalization Act of 1870.
 

Jus sanguinis (right of blood) = the ancient principle of nationality by descent and pedigree. 

Jus soli (right of soil) = a feudal principle tying people to the land of their birth, historically used for serfs.
 

The 14th Amendment and 1870 Act deliberately switched from jus sanguinis to jus soli to: 

• Make Europeans appear “native” by mere soil birth,
• Strip Moors of inherited nationality and make them statutory “persons” of the corporation.
   

Ulysses S. Grant signed the Naturalization Act of 1870 into law. Ostensibly it “extended citizenship” to persons of African descent — but functionally it: 

• Placed Moors under the 14th Amendment,
• Cemented the corporate “United States” identity as an umbrella over everyone,
• Hid the foreign European colonizer status by making them “white citizens” and Moors “Black/Colored persons.”
   

This is the period where hybrid Europeans began codifying “white” as a legal brand, preparing the ground for the 1870 Act and later immigration coaching (Ellis Island). By instructing incoming Europeans to avoid mingling with the aboriginal Moors, they prevented recognition of the true landholders and reinforced the Black Code separation.
 

When today’s government talks about an “immigration crisis,” it’s a smokescreen. Logically, the Naturalization Act should be the answer — but applying it exposes the fraud: 

• Europeans and their descendants have no original free-white nationality;
• The Moors are the original national heirs of the land by jus sanguinis (right of blood) and treaty.
   

These statutes are part of the same social engineering: 

• Black Codes (post-Civil War) made Moors “statutory negroes.”
• Buck Act (1940) extended federal jurisdiction into the states by creating “federal areas” with federal zip codes.
• Together they keep the people as denationalized wards of the UNITED STATES municipal corporation created by the Organic Act of 1871.
   

If the original Naturalization Acts of 1790/1795 were enforced now, the legal corporate fiction collapses: 

• Europeans must prove lawful naturalization or be treated as aliens/colonists,
• Moors automatically stand as nationals by blood and treaty,
• The “immigration crisis” is reframed as a colonizer jurisdiction crisis.

The Naturalization Act of 1870 and unconstitutional 14th Amendment were not simply about extending rights; they were the legal vehicle for foreign European colonists to re-write nationality in their own favor and bury the Moors who are the true aboriginal posterity of the land. This is why:

• You don’t see mainstream discussion of the Naturalization Act of 1790/1795 and the Naturalization Act of 1870,
• Enforcing the Naturalization Act of 1790/1795 would automatically resolve the so-called "immigration problem,"
• Because it would re-classify Europeans as aliens and restore Moors to their rightful status.
   

This is why Noble Drew Ali taught: “Nationality is the order of the day.”